The Indictment Deep Dive

This analysis is intended to examine the indictment paragraph by paragraph.  Each section of the indictment is included and the explanation of any issues then follows.

This is a whistleblower case and the whistleblower is the guilty party in the tax portion of the case.  The statements of Undleeb Dhar, Naseema Dhar and Adam Stout are based on lies and half-truths.  Dhar took the payroll information for Al’s Trailers to a CPA and was told that if the IRS saw it and proceeded with a 100% penalty investigation, he would be responsible for the unpaid trust fund taxes (I agree that he would have).  Instead, he was advised to turn it over to the FBI who may turn it into a criminal investigation.  This would avoid the IRS and may allow Dhar to avoid responsibility.

In early 2020 COVID happened and PPP funding was instituted.  Jamie requested and received PPP loans for various Companies based on their actual payrolls.  Later Dhar reported to SBA that she had received PPP money for Al’s Trailers after it had been permanently closed so SBA started an investigation.  They discovered that Al’s was in fact operating at that time but they found a question on the PPP applications that they claimed she answered incorrectly.

The U S Attorney then opened an investigation.  Ultimately, she created 16000 pages of information, made assumptions from this information but never really analyzed it.  If she had approached us with their data, I could have shown what the numbers meant and why their “discovery” actually largely supported our arguments rather than theirs.  Unfortunately, they went straight to indictment which locked them into their position.

This analysis will look at the indictment item by item to show what the problems are and why it should never have been brought.